Twilight's last gleaming . With his presidency heading into its final stages, we ask whether history is likely to judge him as one of the greats or as a leader who fell short of the expectations he set both for himself and for his country. Twilight's Last Gleaming has 47 ratings and 11 reviews. Scott said: To be upfront with you, I asked to review this book because I have strong and mostly. The 6:30pm screening will be introduced by Nicolas Rapold, Editor-in-Chief, Film Comment. Escaping Hollywood for West Germany, Aldrich produced this masterful late-career nailbiter in which Burt Lancaster’s Air Force General. The Tomatometer rating – based on the published opinions of hundreds of film and television critics – is a trusted measurement of movie and TV programming quality for millions of. What can we as Christians do to halt the downward spiral of our once-great nation? Only a miracle can save America, but fortunately God is in the miracle business! Peter Thomson, Investment Director, Rathbones. On the night of 8 January 2. Nashua, Barack Obama gave a speech that would define his subsequent ascent to the White House. It was shot through with anaphora, a form of deliberate repetition much loved by devotees of rhetoric. On no fewer than 1. United States assured his audience: “Yes, we can.”Obama had just lost the New Hampshire primary to Hillary Clinton. This was supposed to be a concession speech, but it proved a turning point. For when we’ve faced down impossible odds, when we’ve been told we’re not ready or that we shouldn’t try or that we can’t, generations of Americans have responded with a simple creed that sums up the spirit of the people: yes, we can.”His chief adviser at the time, David Axelrod (who later went on to advise Ed Miliband), revealed last year that Obama initially feared such a slogan could count against him. He was worried it might be “too corny”. It was the future First Lady, Michelle Obama, who persuaded him it would help capture the imagination of a voting public tired of what they saw as Washington’s deeply cynical brand of government. Obama would repeatedly return to the same mantra — most notably at his inauguration, when he entered office amid the nascent chaos of the global economic crisis. All this we can do.” The inevitable question now is whether such brave words were ever matched by effective deeds. It was free- market economist Milton Friedman who remarked: “Only a crisis — actual or perceived — produces real change.” There is no doubt that Obama’s election manifesto championed change; and there is no doubt, too, that he inherited a crisis. Friedman, however, was by no means the first person to make such an observation; and Obama was by no means the first politician — or even the first Democratic president — presented with a chance to prove it. Franklin D Roosevelt beat both to the punch, not only identifying the link between calamity and opportunity but exploiting it to spectacular and enduring effect. In the 1. 92. 0s Roosevelt conceded that his party could expect to regain power only if the Republicans led the US into “a serious period of depression and unemployment”. The Wall Street Crash prompted a more prolonged and gruelling phase of national misery than he probably ever dared imagine. His response, the New Deal, did not end the Great Depression, but it laid the foundations for generations of Americans to enjoy a more secure existence. A basic goal was to prepare people for what Roosevelt called “the hazards and vicissitudes” of life, and in this regard a raft of related initiatives succeeded both at the time and for decades to come. Crucially, Roosevelt also brought about a tectonic shift in the nation’s collective psyche and mindset — a feat that Obama’s “Yes, we can” message would later clearly seek to echo. American historian David M Kennedy, a Pulitzer Prize winner, was among those who drew attention to the fast- developing parallels between the events of the 1.
He understood the difference between the urgent and the important.”For Obama it was the urgent that took precedence. With 8. 50,0. 00 US jobs being lost every month and the unemployment rate destined to account for a tenth of the population, he described the economy as a concern “that rises above all the others”. He pushed through the second half of a multi- billion- dollar bank bailout set in motion by the Bush administration and approved a stimulus package worth more than $8. There is no dispute that he thus played a part in preventing economic collapse from metamorphosing into full- blown catastrophe. It is also true, as he highlighted in his final State of the Union address, that America has since witnessed the creation of millions of new jobs and the halving of its unemployment rate. Yet so far there is less evidence of the sort of long- term stability and reassurance that Roosevelt was able to deliver. Some critics have condemned Obama’s approach as too cautious. Nobel- Prize- winning economist Paul Krugman immediately demanded a more aggressive rejoinder to the crisis, essentially advocating that the dire consequences of taking risks should be dealt with by taking more risks. Of course, presidents are less omnipotent than they were. Obama’s was far from the only hand on the economic tiller. As a renowned expert on the Great Depression, Ben Bernanke, the then chairman of the Federal Reserve, was determined not to make the same mistakes as his 1. Roosevelt’s tenure. In the words of David Hollinger, emeritus professor of history at the University of California, Berkeley: “The constraints Obama inherited are genuine and truly massive when contrasted with those faced by Roosevelt.”The fact is that Obama ran out of room for manoeuvre. After less than two years, with the Republicans regaining control of the House of Representatives, the consensus was that any remotely contentious bill would never be passed; and a more dramatic stimulus package represented just such a bill. Obama’s economic legacy might therefore forever be viewed through the hazy prism of “What if?”. What if he had listened to the likes of Krugman — and, according to some sources, his own advisers — and reacted to the crisis more emphatically? What is obvious is that the circumstances that came to dictate his economic policy — the loss of his fragile majority, the Republicans’ explicit resolve to thwart him at every turn, the continued polarisation of the American political system — would increasingly dominate his eight years in office and, in tandem, undermine his formative vision of a unified country and meaningful transformation. Obama first announced himself to the wider world at the 2. Democratic National Convention in Boston, Massachusetts, where he appeared in support of Senator John Kerry, the party’s presidential nominee. His speech, entitled The Audacity of Hope, promptly catapulted him from relative obscurity to the ranks of would- be future leaders. Introducing the themes he would revisit so enthrallingly during his own White House campaign four years later, the then largely unknown senator painted a tantalising picture of a nation no longer riven by irreconcilable political perspectives. Twilight's Last Gleaming; Author: John Michael Greer: Country: United States: Language: English: Genre: Speculative fiction, Political fiction: Published: 2015: Pages: 389: ISBN: 9781782200352. Barack Obama entered the White House on a wave of optimism and with a promise of momentous change. With his presidency heading into its final stages, we ask whether history is likely to judge him as one of the greats or as a. We are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the Stars and Stripes, all of us defending the United States of America.”The idea that partisan differences should — and, moreover, could — be put aside in the interests of a unified America was even then understandably seductive. Unfortunately it was also inherently fanciful. Some might argue Obama proved to be just poor at bi- partisan politics; supporters could say his Republican opponents put their power aspirations above the national interest. Perhaps this is evidence of an inherent flaw in the American political system, or maybe it is a safety mechanism, but it undoubtedly stymied radical change. Obama failed to overcome Republican opposition and in that failure extinguished much of the hope his rhetoric had ignited. Whereas the passing of time has further cemented Roosevelt’s place in the pantheon of outstanding presidents, it is hard to claim with confidence that any of Obama’s reforms will last long enough to survive the judgment of posterity. Most are either the products of compromise or in severe danger of being repealed by a Republican government. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — more popularly referred to as Obamacare — was a milestone and a millstone of Obama’s first term. It required numerous debates and deals even to squeeze through a Congress under Democratic control. It received not a single Republican vote in favour. The act was intended to improve the quality and affordability of healthcare and to cut the number of Americans without health insurance. The Republicans have made no secret of their desire to torpedo it, conceivably stripping around 1. Obama’s strides on the vexed issue of immigration stand in comparable peril. His 2. 01. 4 bid to protect almost five million immigrants from the threat of deportation has already been delayed by legal challenges and could be derailed entirely in the event of a Republican victory later this year — particularly if voters succumb to the manner of demagoguery that has guaranteed Donald Trump so many headlines. His drive to overhaul the criminal justice system is also in jeopardy. So far the effect has been limited: the US prison population still massively exceeds that of any other country — although it is right to say it has declined — and many jail sentences for less serious offences are still absurdly lengthy. The implementation of further and more comprehensive measures will depend on Congress. Any prospect of a radical makeover of America’s gun laws, a cause that has reduced the president to tears, is similarly imperil. Ied. In January 2. State of the Union speech, New York magazine asked more than 5. Obama’s contribution to the US and beyond. Obama is likely to be remembered as a good president — but probably not as a great one. His work on the global stage might well come to be deemed his best. Unlike Roosevelt, Obama did not win a war; but he did wind down several, shrinking the US presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. He oversaw landmark breakthroughs with Cuba and Iran. Having moderated its chronic addiction to fossil fuels, he enabled America to serve as a positive example for other serial mega- polluters — China foremost among them — in anticipation of the COP2. As political scientist Mark Lilla has pointed out: “Good historians pay attention not only to what political figures actively accomplish but to what they prevent from happening — a negative but real accomplishment. Das Ultimatum (1. IMDb. Dan Ballard, a respected citizen in the western town of Silver Lode, has his wedding interrupted by four men led by Fred Mc. Carty, an old acquaintance who, as a US Marshal, arrests Ballard ..
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |